A response to my anti clean feed letter

So today I was excited when I received a letter from the office of Stephen Conroy.

But I was disappointed when I got a fairly flat letter.









I wanted to put this up because I don't think many people that wrote a letter would have put their return addresses down.

I guess I need to do some work to find out if the filters in UK, Sweden, Norway and Finland are mandatory or by request. I would like to say that I think a clean feed as an optional feature from an ISP is an awesome idea. But I fear if we give them an inch on the subject, they will just keep running with it.

The interesting bit about the letter is that they think they can control the content on the Internet like they can control movies and games. All I can think of is my .NET lectures, if all you have is a hammer, all problems start looking like a nail.

Another interesting note is the "live trial" mentioned so that they can be sure that the performance issues are as minor as possible. Who conducts a live trial starting 24th of December. Most of the technicians that would implement the features would want to be on holiday. Families usually try to get away for Christmas and there are lots of things to do outside. I also thought I heard that the live trials were no longer going to be live, they were going to be tested by a task force and not citizens. GAR!

From their FAQ:

Parents rightly expect the Australian Government to play its part in helping protect children online.

Really? We expect the government to assist in babysitting our children? Do parents really just want to have kids so they can palm the responsibility off to someone else?

I love their use of numbers. ACMA has a blacklist of 1300 URLs. Performance may be an issue at 10,000 URLs. Who hands them this information? I mean if I add some GET parameters to the URL, does that mean I can get past the filter (ie. ?filter=lame). All you have to do is get a couple of domains pointing to the same server and you are increasing the number of items on the list. Hell, even subdomain (somthing.domain.com) would cause chaos for whoever needs to look after the list. Regex and wild cards do I hear you say? Is that why people are getting upset at the potential for overfilter. Oh sorry, you're freely hosted webpage on cute kittens is hosted on the same domain as someone who shows a nipple, bad luck for you.

Anyway, I'm hoping to get the letter from Stephen Conroy out to the nocleanfeed people or even the EFA. Whilst it would be cool to have them link directly to this post, I think they could do a better job of disecting the letter. I just feel let down by the government.

Please note that I have no problem with the letter being used on any other page. A link back to me would be handy so that people knew where the letter originated from.